View Single Post
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 01:30 PM
goaliemn's Avatar
goaliemn goaliemn is offline
Sexy thing
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Send a message via AIM to goaliemn Send a message via Yahoo to goaliemn
Quote:
Originally Posted by sloth2946 View Post
Oh and I wasn't saying that a victim's 8th Amendment rights are violated, rather that the violator should be subject to just about any punishment imaginable that is deemed fit.
there's the rub.. most punishments that people consider fit would run into court challenges.
Quote:
The gay marriage laws are again, a red herring. I disagree with them, but you still have the option to go to places where they don't have them or don't enforce them.
At a state level, I agree 100%. If a state you're in passes a law you don't like, move to another state. Its not an easy choice, but its something you can do, logistically, easily. At the federal level, I don't agree. If its passed at the federal level, its much harder to move to another country. It may open up some asylum options, but still much more difficult.

I was using the state examples mainly to show that even tho prohibition was 70+ years ago, stuff still does happen today. Its happened to state constitutions, there was the DOMA act passed a few years ago, and US constitutional amendments have been brought up, but haven't had enough votes to move forward.
Reply With Quote