#1 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2002, 08:52 AM
Numbski Numbski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: St. Louis, was in Colorado Springs
Send a message via AIM to Numbski
Season ends on a sour note.

Gotta love finishing out the season ranked as the number one goalie in the league by all mathematical stats, and be beat by the number 6 team in round 2.

Even worse, it looks like I tore up my right knee in the process. Have a few things to bounce off of you guys:

They scored 4 goals on me in the first two minutes. We completely out-played them the rest of the game, we were down 5-4 in the last minute, I got pulled. They won 6-4. Now, goal number one I was 3 feet out of the crease, screen shot from the point comes, and I wind up making a pretty sweet kick save off my right leg pad. I'm in an awkward position, the puck took a really short rebound, maybe three inches off of my pad. I reach with my stick to bring it in, and THE SAME GUY THAT TOOK THE SHOT comes in, takes the puck off of my stick, skates around me and puts it in. He was screened! How on earth did he get there so fast???? I'm not exactly slow on my rebound control either. I'm not sure if I'm at fault for dawdling on bringing that thing in for the freeze, or if my D is at fault for not defending me long enough to get the face off. ???

Goal number two was a shot from the right face-off dot. Goes off my D's leg, redirects five hole on me and in as I was moving left to get in position to stop the one-timer.

Goal number three is where I'm angry and I need feedback. I was a one on 0 break-away. I came out to challenge, I skate back, back, back, he's still coming....the shot never comes. He winds up like he's going to take a slapper, but never executes. Instead, he plows right into me! I'm guessing this is where I injured my knee, as I got my leg on the puck and stopped it, but when he plowed into me, we both went into the net, and so did the puck. The goal counted. ??????

Shouldn't that have at least been a goaltender interference call? Roughing? Something???

Goal 4 was actually my fault. Shot again from my right, dropped into a butterfly, but wasn't hugging the post. Under my blocker, over my pad, between me and the post and in.

Goal 5, break-away for their best shooter. He decides to come from my left, and I go for a poke check. He gets there with his stick _just_ before my stick does, and since I leaned over to poke, I gave up just enough of the aerial angle to get the puck over me. Ugh!!!

Goal 6, empty net.

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2002, 09:16 AM
sloth2946's Avatar
sloth2946 sloth2946 is online now
Nostraslothus
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Long Island
your questionable goal is indeed a goal as long as the ref determined that he was not intentionally trying to run into you and that it happened incidentally. Sucky way to go out, but c'est la vie!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2002, 10:34 AM
big dog daddy's Avatar
big dog daddy big dog daddy is offline
The zoo keeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: living in the zoo in SW ohio
Send a message via Yahoo to big dog daddy
I feel for you

I've been there before. The goal should count, unfortunatly. I lost in a shoot out a couple weeks ago when a guy shot it from real close(edge of crease) and i put a leg pad on it and he shoved my pad into the net. It counted and they won. The only way that the goal should not count is if the net came off before the puck crossed the line, but in that kind of play it is a jugement call.

Sorry to hear about it, our seaon ends in 2 weeks wish me luck.

BDD
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2002, 12:54 PM
GoalieRick GoalieRick is offline
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Grandville, MI, USA
As this was a case of a one-on-0 breakaway, AND you were skating backwards, AND no shot was ever taken, the calling of a minor penalty for interference or charging should be considered.

USA Hockey Inline Rule Book - Rule 606(c):
"A penalty for interference or charging must be assessed in every case where an opposing player makes unnecessary contact with a goalkeeper."

Obviously, if the referee ruled that the contact was not "unnecessary", the goal should stand.

I think that all too often the officials bend over backward not to penalize a puck carrier who is out of control and crashes into the goaltender. For the safety of the goaltender, I favor a strict interpretation of rule 606(c).
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2002, 08:13 PM
Roymond's Avatar
Roymond Roymond is offline
One Dream, One Chance.
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Send a message via AIM to Roymond Send a message via MSN to Roymond
A situation like this happened to me before. the guy comes in, nails me, gets up and slaps the shot in. He did it diliberately but the ref said it was legal.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0